Verified NovaBench Score: 494



Test run on August 27, 2012
Microsoft Windows 7 Professional K

AMD AMD Athlon II X3 440 running at 3000 MHz

ATI ATI Radeon HD 4200 GPU

5888 MB System RAM (Score: 130)
- RAM Speed: 2893 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 316)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 77062422
- Integer Operations/Second: 247815687
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 797446

Graphics Tests (Score: 23)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 81

Hardware Tests (Score: 25)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 195 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 104 MB/s


---

Verified NovaBench Score: 384



Test run on August 27, 2012
Microsoft Windows 7 Professional K

Intel Intel Celeron E3400 2.60GHz running at 2603 MHz

Intel G41 Express Chipset GPU

4062 MB System RAM (Score: 106)
- RAM Speed: 2435 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 238)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 50973586
- Integer Operations/Second: 150116348
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 850953

Graphics Tests (Score: 14)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 53

Hardware Tests (Score: 26)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 233 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 96 MB/s

---

Verified NovaBench Score: 231

Test run on August 27, 2012
Microsoft Windows XP Professional

Intel Intel Atom D510 1.66GHz running at 1666 MHz

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 3150 GPU

3311 MB System RAM (Score: 92)
- RAM Speed: 2205 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 126)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 42079944
- Integer Operations/Second: 74808052
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 303901

Graphics Tests (Score: 1)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 4

Hardware Tests (Score: 12)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 596 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 8 MB/s

 

---

TG averatec TS-511.K40-M2N3/B

Verified NovaBench Score: 528

Test run on August 27, 2012
Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium K

Intel Intel Core i3 M 380 2.53GHz running at 2533 MHz

Intel HD Graphics GPU

3765 MB System RAM (Score: 118)
- RAM Speed: 5829 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 341)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 102182740
- Integer Operations/Second: 260975708
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 713609

Graphics Tests (Score: 31)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 108

Hardware Tests (Score: 38)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 584 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 82 MB/s




---


msi VR430X MS-1437


Verified NovaBench Score: 276



Test run on August 27, 2012
Microsoft Windows 7 Professional K

AMD AMD Athlon X2 DualCore QL62 running at 2000 MHz

ATI ATI Radeon HD 3200 Graphics GPU

2816 MB System RAM (Score: 79)
- RAM Speed: 1413 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 173)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 44946308
- Integer Operations/Second: 118553144
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 470333

Graphics Tests (Score: 16)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 57

Hardware Tests (Score: 8)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 75 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 31 MB/s


 

---

TG averatec 2500 N2540QH1K

 

Verified NovaBench Score: 249

Test run on August 27, 2012
Microsoft Windows XP Professional

AMD AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK53 running at 1700 MHz

ATI ATI Radeon X1200 Series GPU

1792 MB System RAM (Score: 93)
- RAM Speed: 1833 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 150)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 38836476
- Integer Operations/Second: 100289640
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 420542

Graphics Tests (Score: 2)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 8

Hardware Tests (Score: 4)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 58 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 11 MB/s


---


LG X-NOTE R1 Adveanced(LGW4) R1-TP2007


NovaBench Score: 268


2006-02-15 수요일 10:58:25
Microsoft Windows XP Professional
Intel Core2 T5200 1.60GHz @ 1596 MHz
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400

1023 MB System RAM (Score: 81)
- RAM Speed: 2226 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 166)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 44665348
- Integer Operations/Second: 92872500
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 534532

Graphics Tests (Score: 16)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 58

Hardware Tests (Score: 5)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 44 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 20 MB/s


---

hp ProBook 5220m


Verified NovaBench Score: 548



Test run on September 29, 2012
Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium K

Intel Core i5 M 560 2.67GHz running at 2667 MHz

Intel HD Graphics GPU

3888 MB System RAM (Score: 116)
- RAM Speed: 5036 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 390)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 102920988
- Integer Operations/Second: 324219428
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 853790

Graphics Tests (Score: 30)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 103

Hardware Tests (Score: 12)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 49 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 93 MB/s

 

---

 

DELL Latitude E6400

NovaBench Score: 420


2012-10-04 1:08:14
Microsoft Windows XP Professional
Intel Core2 Duo P8600 2.40GHz @ 2394 MHz
Graphics Card: Mobile Intel(R) 4 Series Express Chipset Family

976 MB System RAM (Score: 84)
- RAM Speed: 2934 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 319)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 138832902
- Integer Operations/Second: 138825492
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 812632

Graphics Tests (Score: 12)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 45

Hardware Tests (Score: 5)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 75 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 12 MB/s


---


NovaBench Score: 727

2014-02-18 8:26:50
Microsoft Windows 8.1 Enterprise K
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T @ 2800 MHz
Graphics Card: ATI Radeon HD 4200 (Microsoft Corporation - WDDM v1.1)

5887 MB System RAM (Score: 134)
- RAM Speed: 3654 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 544)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 154991928
- Integer Operations/Second: 564788118
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 886967

Graphics Tests (Score: 18)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 66

Hardware Tests (Score: 31)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 293 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 106 MB/s


---


Asus X201E


Verified NovaBench Score: 334



Test run on July 25, 2014
Microsoft Windows 7 Professional K

Intel Intel Celeron 1007U 1.50GHz running at 1500 MHz

Intel HD Graphics GPU

3982 MB System RAM (Score: 122)
- RAM Speed: 5987 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 155)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 38832136
- Integer Operations/Second: 90448620
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 511034

Graphics Tests (Score: 33)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 115

Hardware Tests (Score: 24)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 251 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 74 MB/s

 

---

 

한성 A34X

 

Verified NovaBench Score: 556

Test run on September 28, 2014
Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium K

Intel Core i5-4200U 1.60GHz running at 2301 MHz

Intel HD Graphics Family GPU

4016 MB System RAM (Score: 128)
- RAM Speed: 7074 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 356)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 95252800
- Integer Operations/Second: 289627932
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 789392

Graphics Tests (Score: 52)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 173

Hardware Tests (Score: 20)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 119 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 111 MB/s




---

삼성 NT-NC10


NovaBench Score: 152

2015-08-01 ?ㅽ썑 10:08:08
Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition
Intel Atom N270 1.60GHz @ 1596 MHz
Graphics Card: Mobile Intel(R) 945 Express Chipset Family

1015 MB System RAM (Score: 79)
- RAM Speed: 1883 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 68)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 18669774
- Integer Operations/Second: 32444014
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 247577

Graphics Tests (Score: 1)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 3

Hardware Tests (Score: 4)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 43 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 13 MB/s


---

컴팩  프리자리오 V3000

 

NovaBench Score: 171

2015-08-01 �삤�썑 10:53:53
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate K
AMD Turion 64 X2 @ 1600 MHz
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce Go 6150

1983 MB System RAM (Score: 91)
- RAM Speed: 896 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 68)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 17483002
- Integer Operations/Second: 47555994
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 185992

Graphics Tests (Score: 5)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 21

Hardware Tests (Score: 7)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 74 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 25 MB/s

 

 

---

컴팩  프리자리오 V3000


NovaBench Score: 238


2015-08-02 �삤�쟾 5:01:22
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro K
AMD Turion 64 X2 @ 1606 MHz
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce Go 6150

1983 MB System RAM (Score: 97)
- RAM Speed: 2117 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 128)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 35467620
- Integer Operations/Second: 80133248
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 353209

Graphics Tests (Score: 5)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 19

Hardware Tests (Score: 8)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 74 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 31 MB/s


---


msi U100 Plus


NovaBench Score: 158

2015-08-04 �삤�썑 3:41:26
Microsoft Windows XP Professional
Intel Atom N280 1.66GHz @ 1666 MHz
Graphics Card: Mobile Intel(R) 945 Express Chipset Family

1014 MB System RAM (Score: 80)
- RAM Speed: 2066 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 71)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 19830136
- Integer Operations/Second: 33634806
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 257048

Graphics Tests (Score: 1)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 3

Hardware Tests (Score: 6)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 78 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 15 MB/s

 

 

---

도시바 Satellite L100

 

NovaBench Score: 174


2015-08-11 �삤�썑 4:10:33
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate K
Intel Celeron M 1.70GHz @ 1695 MHz
Graphics Card: �몴以� VGA 洹몃옒�뵿 �뼱�뙌�꽣

895 MB System RAM (Score: 71)
- RAM Speed: 895 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 95)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 22505125
- Integer Operations/Second: 41752042
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 439822

Graphics Tests (Score: 0)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 0

Hardware Tests (Score: 8)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 74 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 31 MB/s

 

---

한성 SPARQ SLX350 

 

NovaBench Score: 532


2015-08-13 �삤�쟾 11:21:20
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate K
Intel Core i32310M 2.10GHz @ 2100 MHz
Graphics Card: Intel(R) HD Graphics 3000

8140 MB System RAM (Score: 182)
- RAM Speed: 9271 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 298)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 101065236
- Integer Operations/Second: 220010356
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 572228

Graphics Tests (Score: 28)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 99

Hardware Tests (Score: 24)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 233 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 81 MB/s

신고
Posted by aaidee 아아이디

댓글을 달아 주세요

  1. moncler 2013.01.04 15:40 신고  댓글주소  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    A ce jour, cette vague de décès, qui a commencé le soir de la Saint-Sylvestre, http://www.moncleroutletespain.com/ moncler chaquetas,?reste inexpliquée, a indiqué la commission de la chasse et de la pêche de cet Etat du Sud américain, http://www.moncleroutletespain.com/ moncler outlet. Des tests doivent être pratiqués lundi, http://www.moncleroutletespain.com/ http://www.moncleroutletespain.com/. La plupart des oiseaux sont des carouges à épaulettes, reconnaissables à leurs taches rouges à la base des ailes, http://www.moncleroutletespain.com/ moncler españa.Selon un quotidien de l'Etat, http://www.moncleroutletespain.com/ moncler online, les oiseaux pourraient avoir été touchés par la grêle en haute altitude. Une autre théorie met en cause les feux d'artifice du Nouvel An qui pourraient avoir surpris les oiseaux en plein vol, http://www.moncleroutletespain.com/ moncler. Actu en continu Séisme à Sumatra en Indonésie Actu en continu Intempéries/Colombie : 2010 particulièrement meurtrièreRelated articles:


    http://canonblogs.com/834 http://canonblogs.com/834

    http://canonblogs.com/677 http://canonblogs.com/677

  2. moncler chaquetas 2013.01.05 22:46 신고  댓글주소  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    Le Japon est prêt à ouvrir "un dialogue direct" avec la Corée du Nord, http://www.moncleroutletespain.com/ moncler españa, qui constituera l'un des "thèmes majeurs" de cette nouvelle année, http://www.moncleroutletespain.com/ moncler online, a déclaré mardi le ministre japonais des Affaires étrangères, http://www.moncleroutletespain.com/ moncler, Seiji Maehara, http://www.moncleroutletespain.com/ moncler chaquetas.Related articles:


    http://sevent7us.com/30 http://sevent7us.com/30

    http://gihyangkang.tistory.com/158 http://gihyangkang.tistory.com/158

3DMark06, PCMark05:  많이 쓰이는 프로그램의 프리웨어 구버전

http://www.futuremark.com/


NovaBench

http://novabench.com/


Sandra Lite:  많이 쓰이는 프로그램의 프리웨어 버전

http://www.sisoftware.net/


PC-WIZARD

http://www.cpuid.com/softwares/pc-wizard.html


HWiNFO32, HWiNFO64

http://www.hwinfo.com/


CINEBENCH

http://www.maxon.net/kr/products/cinebench/overview.html


Prime95: 메르센 소수를 찾는 속도를 벤치마킹하는 프로그램

http://www.mersenne.org/freesoft/


wPrime: 파이를 계산하는 속도를 벤치마킹하는 프로그램. 멀티스레드 지원.

http://www.wprime.net/


PiFast: 파이를 계산하는 속도를 벤치마킹하는 프로그램

http://numbers.computation.free.fr/Constants/PiProgram/pifast.html


Universe Benchmark: 파이를 계산하는 속도를 벤치마킹하는 프로그램. 멀티프로세서 지원. 자바 필요. 자유오픈소스.

http://sourceforge.net/projects/universebench/?source=directory


Hyper PI: 파이를 계산하는 속도를 벤치마킹하는 프로그램. 멀티프로세서 미지원

http://virgilioborges.com.br/hyperpi/


DoubleMark: 소수를 계산하는 속도를 벤치마킹하는 프로그램

http://www.overclock.net/t/282587/doublemark-prime-benchmark-open-source


Fract Benchmark: 자유오픈소스

http://sourceforge.net/projects/fract/?source=directory


Phoronix Test Suite: 자유오픈소스

http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/


freebench: 리눅스, BSD, 맥 만 지원. 자유오픈소스

http://code.google.com/p/freebench/


CPU RM

http://cpu.rightmark.org/products/cpurm.shtml


CrystalMark

http://crystalmark.info/


신고
Posted by aaidee 아아이디

댓글을 달아 주세요

  1. toms outlet 2013.07.16 22:34 신고  댓글주소  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    지금은 반짝반짝 빛이 나겠지,, 하지만 시간이 흐르면 그빛은 사라저버릴거야,지금 우리처럼

  2. 최고가 2014.11.12 18:26 신고  댓글주소  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    스마트폰(분습)o1o398o71oo폰연락주세요

http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/


https://www.ohloh.net/languages/compare


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measuring_programming_language_popularity


http://lang-index.sourceforge.net/


http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html


http://langpop.com/


http://lui.arbingersys.com/index.html


http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends


http://www.simplyhired.com/a/jobtrends/home


http://www.flexjobs.com/trends


http://www.google.com/trends/


http://trend.search.daum.net/SearchTrend/index.html



프로그래밍 언어 벤치마크 게임

제일 짧게 프로그래밍할 수 있는 언어는 무엇일까?

PHP 프레임워크 벤치마크 자료


2012.9.13.

The RedMonk Programming Language Rankings: September 2012

http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2012/09/12/language-rankings-9-12/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+tecosystems+%28tecosystems%29


2012.9.14.

http://attractivechaos.github.com/plb/


2012.10.24.

http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=python%20language%2C%20ruby%20language%2C%20groovy%20language%2C%20lua%20language%2C%20scala%20language&cmpt=q


http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32/which-programs-are-best.php


http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32/which-programs-are-best.php?calc=chart&gpp=on&ifc=on&java=on&ghc=on&sbcl=on&csharp=on&v8=on&hipe=on&lua=on&vw=on&php=on&python3=on&jruby=on&perl=on&yarv=on&xfullcpu=0&xmem=0&xloc=1&nbody=1&fannkuchredux=1&meteor=0&fasta=1&fastaredux=1&spectralnorm=1&revcomp=1&mandelbrot=1&knucleotide=1®exdna=1&pidigits=1&chameneosredux=0&threadring=0&binarytreesredux=0&binarytrees=1


http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32/which-programs-are-best.php?calc=chart&yarv=on&perl=on&jruby=on&python3=on&v8=on&lua=on&php=on&vw=on&hipe=on&csharp=on&ifc=on&java=on&ghc=on&gpp=on&sbcl=on&xfullcpu=0&xmem=1&xloc=0&nbody=1&fannkuchredux=1&meteor=0&fasta=1&fastaredux=1&spectralnorm=1&revcomp=1&mandelbrot=1&knucleotide=1®exdna=1&pidigits=1&chameneosredux=0&threadring=0&binarytreesredux=0&binarytrees=1



http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=django%20framework%2C%20ruby%20on%20rails%20framework%2C%20codeigniter%20framework%2C%20yii%20framework%2C%20symfony%20framework&cmpt=q


http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=codeigniter%20php%2C%20yii%20php%2C%20ruby%20on%20rails%2C%20django%20python&cmpt=q


2013.1.4.


http://raid6.com.au/~onlyjob/posts/arena/


2013. 3. 15.


http://langpop.corger.nl/


2013. 10. 16.


http://blog.gmarceau.qc.ca/2009/05/speed-size-and-dependability-of.html


http://onionstand.blogspot.kr/2009/06/fast-concise-and-reliable-code-try-perl.html


http://blog.wolfram.com/2012/11/14/code-length-measured-in-14-languages/


2014. 1. 3.


https://sites.google.com/site/pydatalog/pypl/PyPL-PopularitY-of-Programming-Language


http://www.computerworld.com/slideshow/detail/98085#slide1


2014. 2. 6.


http://blog.codeeval.com/codeevalblog/2014#.UvJiq_iLelM


2014. 4. 11.


http://dada.perl.it/shootout/


2005.1.1.

http://redmonk.com/dberkholz/2013/03/25/programming-languages-ranked-by-expressiveness/


http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2013/02/28/language-rankings-1-13/


http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2014/01/22/language-rankings-1-14/


http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2014/06/13/language-rankings-6-14/



2015.5.18.

http://raid6.com.au/~onlyjob/posts/arena/



2015.7.23.

http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/software/the-2015-top-ten-programming-languages

신고
Posted by aaidee 아아이디

댓글을 달아 주세요

  1. 오호 2012.10.14 16:51 신고  댓글주소  수정/삭제  댓글쓰기

    아..이런것도 있었네요...프로그램 벤치라..
    좋은 자료 감사합니다.

프로그래밍 언어 벤치마킹 사이트입니다.
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/

x86 1코어 속도, 메모리, 용량순
x64 4코어 속도, 메모리, 용량순
x86 4코어 속도, 메모리, 용량순
x64 1코어 속도, 메모리, 용량순

계속 루비가 1위를 하다가 최근에 파이썬으로 바뀌었습니다.

자바스크립트나 펄도 루비, 파이썬정도 분량입니다.

특히, 타입 선언이 없는 언어들이 분량이 적은 것 같습니다.

쿼드코어판에서는 파이썬3가 제일 짧다고 나옵니다.

Time secs는 수행 시간, Memory KB는 사용 메모리, Code B는 gzip으로 압축한 용량을 나타냅니다.

0,0,1을 입력하면 프로그램 분량을 벤치마킹할 수 있습니다.

전반적으로 파이썬, 루비, 자바스크립트, 펄, 루아, PHP가 분량이 적다고 나옵니다.

1,0,0을 입력하면 속도 비교가 됩니다.

C++, C, Java 6 Server, Scala, Ocaml, Free Pascal이 빠르다고 합니다.

Mono C#이 자바 Server보다 느리고, 파이썬보다 캐시 없는 PHP가 두배 이상 느립니다.

Java 6 Server와 Scala는 속도가 비슷합니다.


1,0,1을 입력하면 속도와 분량을 같이 가중치두는 것입니다.

이 순위는 C, C++, LuaJIT, Scala, Ocaml, Java 6 Server, Free Pascal, Haskell, Clean이 상위입니다.

Scala나 Ocaml같은 함수형 언어가 분량도 적고 속도도 씨정도로 빠르다니 매력적이네요.

GM이란 말이 이해가 안 갑니다.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weighted_geometric_mean

For each benchmark, B is the best measurement; for each language implementation, the best measurement L is then normalized to L/B. GM is the Weighted Geometric Mean of those L/B ratios.

B가 수행 시도중 최대값이고 L은 언어 중 최대값인데 L/B로 정규화된다는 뜻인가요??

무슨 뜻이죠?

Which programming language is best? The Weighted Geometric Mean
Read "How not to lie with statistics: the correct way to summarize benchmark results" (pdf).

For each benchmark, B is the best measurement; for each language implementation, the best measurement L is then normalized to L/B

GM is the Weighted Geometric Mean of those L/B ratios.

missing : Language implementations with more than a couple of Timeouts (at the largest workload) distort the ranking - so they have been excluded. They can still be compared directly against another language implementation.


다른 결과 지문과 표를 잘 읽어보니까 each benchmarks는 각각의 알고리듬을 얘기하는 겁니다.

each language implementations는 각각의 다른 종류의 언어를 뜻합니다.

언어1(c++) x1.0, GM1.14: 알고리듬a(regex-dna) a1초, 알고리듬b(reverse-complement) b2초, 알고리듬c(n-body) c3초
언어2(c) x1.2, GM1.42: 알고리듬a a2초, 알고리듬b b2초, 알고리듬c c2초
언어3(java) x1.7, GM1.93:  알고리듬a a3초, 알고리듬b b3초, 알고리듬c c3초

이렇게 되어 있을 때 GM이 어떻게 나온 건지 아시는 분 계신가요?

c++가 1이라고 할 때 c가 1.2배인 것은 이해가 가는데 GM이 1.14인 것은 구체적으로 어떻게 나온 건지 모르겠습니다.

스프레드시트로 계산을 해봤습니다.

L/B를 일단 구해야 되는데요, L은 알고리듬a 결과가 제일 빠르게 나온 언어x의 값을 얘기하는 것 같습니다.

B는 구하고싶은 언어1의 알고리듬a 결과입니다.

즉 어떤 언어의 알고리듬a 결과를 제일 빨리 나온 언어x값으로 나눈다는 뜻입니다.

나온 알고리듬a부터 알고리듬c까지를 전부 곱해서 3제곱근을 구하면 기하평균이 GM보다 약간 큰 값이 나왔습니다.

가중치를 어떻게 곱하는 건지 모르겠습니다.

가중치를 곱할 때 어떤 걸 가중치로 썼다는 걸까요?

알고리듬 중요성별로 가중치를 두었다는 뜻 같은데요.

그러니까 정리하면 GM이란 정확히말해 가중기하평균을 얘기하는 거고 그건 어떤 알고리듬들을 제일 빨리 수행한 언어들 대비 몇 배 느린가를 평균낸 겁니다. 만약 각 알고리듬을 모두 제일 빨리 수행하는 가상의 언어가 있다면 그것에 비해 몇 배 느린가를 뜻하는 거죠.

X는 GM이 제일 빠른 언어가 있을 때 다른 언어들의 비율입니다.

관련 소스는 여기에 있습니다. 템플릿이 사용되어 구조가 이해가 안가네요.
https://alioth.debian.org/scm/viewvc.php/shootout/website/lib/?root=shootout

실제 프로그래밍에 걸린 시간을 측정하는 벤치마킹도 나왔으면 좋겠습니다.

신고
Posted by aaidee 아아이디

댓글을 달아 주세요